1. Argüelles Álvarez, I. & Pablo-Lerchundi, I. (2012). …And back to multiple choice! Large-scale testing of proficiency in English: an experience. ODISEA, Revista de Estudios Ingleses, 13, 9-18.
2. Argüelles Álvarez, I., Pablo-Lerchundi, I., Herradón Díez, R. & Baños Expósito, J.M. (2011). Largescale Testing of Proficiency in English: Back to Multiple Choice? Proceedings of the BAAL Conference (pp. 13-16). University of the West of England.
3. Atkinson, T. & Davies, G. (2005) ICT4LT module—Computer Aided Assessment (CAA) and language learning. Available online at: http://www.ict4lt.org/en/index.htm (accessed 16 November 2005).
4. Attewell, J., Savill-Smith, C. & Douch, R. (2009) The impact of mobile learning: examining what it means for teaching and learning (London, Learning and Skills Network).
5. Balanskat, A., Blamire, R. & Kefala, S. (2006) The ICT impact report: a review
6. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers’ development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13,63–73.
7. Cher Ping Lim, Hanbing Yan and Xibei Xiong, Development of pre-service teachers’ information and communication technology (ICT) in education competencies in a mainland Chinese university, Educational Media International, 2015 Vol. 52, No. 1, 15–32.
8. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching and assessment. Strasbourg: Cambridge University Press.
9. Cox, M.J. & Marshall, G. (2007) Effects of ICT: do we know what we should know? Education and Information Technologies,12(2), 59–70.
10. Durán, P., & Pierce, J. (2007). An EAP literacy portfolio for tertiary education students: Academic and professional discourse development within the European framework of reference for languages. In A. C.
11. Durán, P., Cuadrado, G., Pierce, J., Roldán, A., Ubeda, P., Robisco, M., & Santiago, J. (2009). Academic and professional ELP for higher education and professional language learners purposes. Madrid: Endymion.
12. Ellaway R, Martin R. 2008. What’s mine is yours – open source as a new paradigm for sustainable healthcare education. Med Teach 30(2):175–179.
13. Ellaway R, Masters K. 2008. AMEE Guide 32: e-learning in medical education Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment. Med Teach 30(5):455–473.
14. Fuchs, T. & Woessmann, L. (2004) Computers and student learning: bivariate and multivariate evidence on the availability and use of computers at home and at school (Munich, CESifo GmbH).
15. George Zhou, Stanley Varnhagen. Myrna R. Sears, Susan Kasprzak, Gail Shervey, Online professional development for inservice teachers in Information and Communication Technology: Potentials and challenges, Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology Volume 33(2) Spring / printemps 2007
16. Harrison, C., Comber, C., Fisher, T., Haw, K., Lewin, C., Lunzer, E. et al. (2003) ImpaCT2: the impact of information and communication technologies on pupil learning and attainment (Coventry, Becta).
17. Hood, P. (2000) Logging on to learning: ICT, modern languages and real communicative classrooms?, in: S. Green (Ed.)New perspectives on teaching and learning modern languages (Clevedon, Multilingual Matters), 124–137.
18. Jimoyiannisa, A., & Komisb, V. (2007). Examining teachers’ beliefs about ICT education: Implications of a teacher preparation program. Teacher Development, 11, 149–173.
19. Long, M. H. (2011). Methodological principles for language teaching. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Teaching (pp. 373-394). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
20. Marilyn Hunt, Sean Neill and Ann Barnes, The use of ICT in the assessment of modern languages: the English context and European viewpoints, Educational Review Vol. 59, No. 2, May 2007, pp. 195–213
21. Marra, R. (2004). An online course to help teachers “Use Technology to Enhance Learning”: Successes and limitations. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(3), 411–429.
22. Norcini JJ, Anderson B, Bollela V, Burch V, Costa MJ, Duvivier R, Galbraith R, Hays R, Kent A, Perrott V. 2011. Criteria of good assessment
23. Norcini JJ, McKinley DW. 2007. Assessment methods in medical education. Teach Teach Educ 23:239–250.
24. Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (2000). The use of use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(1), 23-38.
25. Rompelman, O. (2000). Assessment of student learning: Evolution of objectives in engineering education and the consequences for assessment. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(4), 339-350.
26. Sebba Deakin, J., Crick, R., Guoxing, Y. (2008). Systematic review of research evidence of the impact on students in secondary schools of self and peer assessment. London: EPPI-Centre.
27. Sonia Livingstone, Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education, Oxford
28. Underwood, J. (2009) The impact of digital technology: a review of the evidence of the impact of digital technologies on formal education (Coventry, Becta).
29. Van Hattum-Janssen, N., & Lourenco, J. M. (2008). Peer- and self- assessment for first-year students as a tool to improve learning. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 134(4), 346-352.