Перейти к содержимому
UzScite
  • НСИ
    • Новости События
    • Методическая информация
    • Нормативные документы
  • Каталог журналов
  • Указатель авторов
  • Список организаций

The historical context for the problems of Modernization of the public consciousness and Cultural memory for Кazakhstani societyа

Zhuldyzbek A.

Krupko I.

Bulletin of the International institute for Central Asian studies

  • № 30 2020

Страницы: 

7

 – 

17

Язык: английский

Открыть файл статьи
Открыть страницу статьи в Интернет

Аннотация

This article attempts to indicate some problems that, in our opinion, actually exist within the modern postSoviet states and to highlight the factors that hinder and restrain the processes of modernization of the public consciousness. It is clear that each of them requires a more detailed review and reasoning with the help of additional extensive and diversified knowledge of the sources, i.e. in-depth argumentation. However,the limited content of the article prohibits this. In addition, the main focus of the article seeks to highlight the key concerns which are socially significant and at the same time are controversial aspects of the current developmental practices of the post-Soviet independent states. These problems are many and diverse. In this regard, it is quite possible that the aim to raise not just one, but a number of such questions in this article will be perceived as a kind of chaotic oversaturation of the problem. Nevertheless, this is due to the willingness to “discuss many disturbing issues,” albeit in a staged manner, and sometimes with rather broad brushstrokes.This article considers the historical genealogy, context, and content for the problems of the modernization of the public consciousness and cultural memory within Kazakhstani society. It emphasizes that reflections and stereotypes of the traditional agrarian mentality expands their niches in the socio-cultural space of Kazakhstan.The success of such an «intervention» is majorly, if not overwhelmingly, conditioned by the social structure’s peculiarities in modern society and, in particular, by the processes of marginalization and impoverishment of wide population segments (which is typical for all post-Soviet states). All of the above is legitimized by the symbolic resources found in historical memory, the digital environment, media, and areas of discourse which solidify symmetrically the informational matrix structures of the traditional sociocultural context.

Список использованных источников

  1. Abashin, S. N. (2007). N. Natsionalizmy v Sredney Azii: v poiskakh identichnosti [Nationalism in Central Asia:in search of identity]. St.Petersburg: Aleteya Publ. (In Russian).
  2. Abylkhozhin, Zh. B. (2019). Poststalinskiy period v istorii Kazakhstana: chereda obrechennyh reform i nesostoyavshikhsya deklaratsiy (1953-1991) [The post-Stalinist period in the history of Kazakhstan: a series of doomed reforms and failed declarations (1953-1991)]. Almaty:KBTU Publ. (In Russian).
  3. Barthold, V. (1964). Sochineniya [Collected Works]. Vol. II,Part II. Moscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).Ismagambetov, T. (2018). Natsiestroitelstvo v Kazakhstane:mezhdu kazakhstanskim narodom i natsiey[Nation-building in Kazakhstan: between the Kazakh people and the nation] // CAAN - 08/13/2018. URL:https://caa-network.org/archives/13450 (date of access 10/25/2020).
  4. Krupko, I. V. (2018). Nostalgii-utopii v epokhu moderna[Nostalgiautopia in the era of modernity] // Abay atyndagy KazPU-nin khabarshysy, tarikh zhane sayasi-ale-11 URL: https://informburo.kz/interview/kasym-zhomart-tokaev-vse-nacionalnosti-prozhivayushchie-v-kazahstane-po-suti-yavlyayutsya-edinoy-naciey.html?_utl_t=wh (date of access– Ocotber 25, 2020). umettik qylymdar seriyasy, No. 3 (58), 2018. P. 365-372(In Russian).
  5. Markov, G. E. (1976). Kochevniki Azii. Struktura hozyaistva i obschestvennoy organizatsii [Nomads of Asia. The structure of the economy and social organization].Moskva: MGU Publ. (In Russian). Masanov, N.E. (1995). Kochevaya tsivilizatsiya kazakhov:osnovy zhiznedeyatelnosti nomadnogo obschestva [The nomadic civilization of the Kazakhs: the foundations of the life of the nomadic society]. Almaty: Sotsinvest -Moscow: Horizon Publ. (In Russian).
  6. Naurzbayeva, Z. (2019). Rodoslovnyie «shezhyre» kak forma kollektivnoy pamyati [Genealogy of “shezhire” as a form of collective memory] // Otuken, 2019 // http://otuken.kz/shezhire/ (In Russian). Suleimenov, O. (2011). Az i Ya [Az and Ya]. Almaty:Biblioteka Olzhasa Publ. (In Russian).Suzhikov, B.M. (2019). Ocherki zarubezhnoy istoriografii
  7. Kazakhstana [Essays on the foreign historiography of Kazakhstan]. Almaty: Ushkiyan Publ. (In Russian).Valikhanov, Ch. Ch. (1984). Sobraniye sochineniy v 5 tomah [Collected works in 5 volumes]. Vol. I. Alma-Ata (In Russian).

Список всех публикаций, цитирующих данную статью

Copyright © 2025 UzScite | E-LINE PRESS