Rankings in higher education

  • 2014

Страницы: 

43

 – 

53

Язык: английский

Открыть файл статьи

Аннотация

Список использованных источников

  1. ALTBACH, PH. (2004). The costs and benefits of world-class universities.International Higher Education. The Boston College. www.bc.edu.
  2. BRICALL, J.M. (2008): Plan marco UB horizonte 2020. Universitat de Barcelona.
  3. BUELA-CASAL, G. & GUTIÉRREZ-MARTÍNEZ, O. (2007). Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities.Scientometrics,Vol. 71 (3), pp 349–365.
  4. CHENG, Y. & LIU. N.C. (2007). Academic Ranking of World Universities by Broad Subject Fields. Higher Education in Europe, Vol. 32 (3), pp. 17-29.
  5. DILL, D. & SOO, M. (2005). Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems. Higher Education, Vol. 49; pp 495-533.
  6. FEDERKEIL, G. (2008 a). Graduate Surveys as a Measure in University Rankings. En Outcomes of Higher Education: Quality Relevance and Impact. IMHE-OCDE.
  7. FEDERKEIL, G. (2008 b). Rankings and Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Higher Education in Europe, Vol. 33, 2/3, pp. 219-231.
  8. HARVEY, L. & STENSAKER, B. (2008). Quality culture: understanding, boundaries and linkages. European Journal of Education. Vol. 43 (4), pp. 427-442.
  9. HAZELKORN, E. (2007). Impact and Influence of League Tables and Ranking Systems on Higher Education Decision-Making. Higher Education Management and Policy, Vol.19 (2), pp. 87-110.
  10. HAZELKORN, E. (2008a). The emperor has no clothes? Rankings and the shift from quality assurance to world-class excellence. Bollaert et al. (eds): Trends in Quality Assurance. 3rd European Quality Assurance Forum. Budapest.
  11. HAZELKORN, E. (2008b) Rankings and the Battle for World Class Excellence:Institutional Strategies and Policy Choices. En Outcomes of Higher Education:Quality Relevance and Impact. IMHE-OCDE.
  12. INCE, M. (2007). The World University Rankings. The Times Higher Education Supplement. Ponencia en el congreso “UniversityRankings”, Leiden University (NL) septiembre.
  13. MARGINSON, S. (2008). A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the KEconomy. The New World Order in Higher Education: Research Rankings,Outcomes Measures and Institutional Classifications. IMHE.OCDE.
  14. NEAVE, G. (1994): The Politics of Quality: Developments in Higher Education in Western Europe 1992-1994. European Journal of Education Vol. 29 (2), pp 115-133.
  15. ROZMAN, I. & MARHL, M. (2008). Improving the Quality of Universities by World-University-Ranking: A Case Study of the University of Maribor.
  16. Higher Education in Europe, Vol. 33 (2/3), pp. 317-329.
  17. SALMI,J. & SAROYAN, A. (2007). Las tablas de clasificacióncomoinstrumentosdefinitorios de laspolíticas: La economíapolítica de la rendición de cuentas en la educaciónterciaria. En “La Educación Superior en el Mundo”. Informe Mundial 2007 de la Global University Network for Innovation (GUNI). Ed Mundi-Prensa.
  18. SALMI, J. & MALEE-BASSET, R. (2009). Rankigs and League Tables: a Global Perspective. A propósitodeldocumentoThe Challenge of Establishing World-Class Universities.
  19. Cnt.heeact.edu/tw/article/Jamil.pdf. Publicadopor World Bank.
  20. TAMBI, A.M. & GHAZALIB, M.C. & YAHYAC, N.Y. (2008). The ranking of higher education institutions: A deduction or delusion?.Total Quality Management. Vol. 19 (10), pp, 997–1011.
  21. TAYLOR, R .& BRADDOCK, R. (2007). International University Ranking Systems and the Idea of University Excellence. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management Vol. 29(3), pp.245–260.
  22. THIBAUD, A. & LESUEUR, J.T. (2009). Vers quel classement européen des universités ? Etude comparative du classement de Shanghai et des autres classements internationaux. Note de Benchmarking 4. Institut Thomas More,Paris.
  23. USHER, A. & SAVINO, M. (2006). A World of Difference: A Global Survey of University League Tables. Educational Policy Institute. Ontario. Canada.
  24. Free from http://www.educationalpolicy.org/worlddifference.html.
  25. USHER, A. & SAVINO, M. (2007).Global Survey of University Ranking and League Tables. Higher Education in Europe, Vol. 32 (1), pp. 5-15.
  26. VAN DYKE, N. (2005). Twenty Years of University Report Cards. Higher Education in Europe, Vol. 30 (2) , pp103-125.
  27. VAN VUGHT, F. A., & WESTERHEIJDEN, D. F. (1994). Towards a general model of quality assessment in higher education. Higher Education,Vol. 28, pp.355-371.
  28. WESTERHEIJDEN, D.F. & al. (eds) 2007. Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Trends in Regulation, Translation and Transformation. Higher Education Dynamics, 20. Douro Series. Springer (NL).
  29. WESTERHEIJDEN, D.F., FEDERKEIL,G., CREMONINI,L., KAISER,F.,SOO,M. (2008). . Can’t Get No Satisfaction? Promises and Problems of the CHE Ranking in Comparing Student Satisfaction between Germany, the Netherlands and Flanders. In Outcomes of Higher Education: Quality Relevance and Impact. IMHE-OCDE.
  30. WILLIAMS, R. (2008). Methodology, meaning and usefulness of rankings.Australian Universities Review, Vol. 50 (2), pp 51-58.

Список всех публикаций, цитирующих данную статью