Перейти к содержимому
UzScite
  • НСИ
    • Новости События
    • Методическая информация
    • Нормативные документы
  • Каталог журналов
  • Указатель авторов
  • Список организаций

Intraabdominal bleedings after various options of cholecystectomy

Рахимов О.У.

Кутлымуратов А.Д.

Алтыев Б.К.

Касимов У.Р.

Вестник Ташкентской медицинской академии

  • № 1 2018

Страницы: 

16

 – 

19

Язык: английский

Открыть файл статьи
Открыть страницу статьи в Интернет

Аннотация

Как показал обзор литературы, ведущее место среди внутрибрюшных осложнений после различных вариантов холецистэктомии занимают послеоперационные кровотечения, в структуре послеоперационных осложнений составляющие около 4%. Причины возникновения внутрибрюшных кровотечений после холецистэктомии различны, однако наиболее часто ими становятся плохое качество и техника выполнения оперативных вмешательств, недостаточно тщательный и надежный интраоперационный гемостаз. Отечественные и зарубежные авторы отмечают, что признаки внутрибрюшных кровотечений в билиарной хирургии наиболее легко выявляются с помощью эхографии, которая благодаря своей неинвазивности, быстроте выполнения, высокой чувствительности считается методом скрининга. Точность установления наличия внутрибрюшных кровотечений и гематом после холецистэктомии во много раз возрастает при применении КТ и МСКТ в режиме 3D-реконструкции.

Ҳар-хил вариантдаги холецистэктомиядан кейин кўп учрайдиган асорталардан бири – бу операциядан кейинги ички қон кетиш, барча операциядан кейинги асоратларнинг ўртача 4 % ни ташкил этади. Операциядан кейинги қорин бўшлиғи ичи қон кетиши ривожланишининг сабаблари турлича. Кўпчилик авторларнинг маълумотларига кўра энг асосий сабаблардан операцияни бажарилиши техника ва сифати пастлиги, интраоперацион бажарилган гемостазнинг ва эътибор етарлича эмаслигидир. Ҳам маҳаллий, ҳам хорижий муаллифларнинг таъкидлашича билиар жаароҳликда қон кетиш белгилари эхография ёрдамида нисбатан осон аниқланади, эхография ўзининг ноинвазивлиги, бажарилиши тезлиги, қулайлиги, юқори сезувчанлиги туфайли скрининг усули ҳисобланади. Холецистэктомиядан кейинги қорин бўшлиғи ичи қон кетиши ва гематомаларини аниқлаш аниқлиги КТ ва МСКТ 3D-реконструкция режимида фойдаланилганда бир неча баробарга ошади.

As the review of literature has shown, the leading place among intra-abdominal complications after various variants of cholecystectomy is postoperative bleeding, which is about 4% in the structure of postoperative complications. The causes of intraabdominal bleedings after cholecystectomy are different, but most often they are poor quality and technique of performing surgical interventions, insufficiently thorough and reliable intraoperative hemostasis. Domestic and foreign authors note that signs of intraabdominal bleedings in biliary surgery are most easily detected with the help of echography, which due to its noninvasiveness, speed of execution, high sensitivity is considered as a screening method. The use of CT and MSCT in 3D reconstruction much more increases accuracy of establishing the presence of intra-abdominal bleedings and hematomas after cholecystectomy.

Список использованных источников

  1. Akilov H.A., Saatov R. R., Akbarov M. M., etc. Endoscopic technology at the yatrogennykh damages of extra hepatic bilious ways and external bilious fistulas//the 13th International congress of surgeonshepatologists of CIS countries. Annals хир. гепатол. 2006; 11 (3): 63.
  2. Alidzhanov F.B. Tactics of treatment of destructive forms of cholecystitis with application low-invasive technologies/ F.B.Alidzhanov, Sh.E.Baymuradov, A.M.Khozhiboyev, etc.//Actual problems of the organization of emergency medical care: Tez.Dokl. – Urgench, 2006. - Page 74-75.
  3. Altyev B. K. Diagnostics and treatment of damages, post-traumatic стриктур and external fistulas of bilious channels: Dis.... Dr.s of medical sciences. Tashkent, 1999.
  4. Altyev B. K., Atadzhanov Sh. K., Boynazarov I.Kh., etc. Recovery and reconstructive operations at damages and cicatricial the strikturakh of bilious channels//the 13th International congress of surgeonshepatologists of CIS countries. Annals хир. гепатол. 2006; 11 (3): 64.
  5. Atadzhanov Sh. K. Analysis of complications of laparoscopic holetsistektomiya and way of their prevention. Zhurn. теорет. and wedge. medical 2005; 2: 89-93.
  6. Afendulov S. A., Krasnolutsky N. A., Zhuravlev G. Yu., etc. Repeated laparoscopic operations in treatment of complications after traditional and laparoscopic interventions. Endoscope. хир. 2001; 1: 8-10.
  7. Balalykin A.S. To a question of dangers of operations LHE and prevention ways Complications/Balalykin A.S, Haburzaniya A.K., Muttskrov H.S., Snegirenv YU.V., etc.//Collecting. тез. the tenth юбил. congress inter@ on the endoscope. surgeries. - M, 2006. - The Mat. congress.-2006. - From 25-26.
  8. Beburishvili A.G. Ultrasonic methods in diagnostics and treatment postoperative the intraabdominalnykh and the intraparenkhimatoznykh of abscesses of liver / A.G. Beburishvili, E.N. Zyubin, E.G. Spiridonov, O. P. Kalmykova, Yu.I. Vedenin//Materials of the third international congress of surgeons. — Moscow, 2008. — Page 44.
  9. Berebitsky S. S., Nikolashin V.A. Diagnosticheskaya the value of a telelaparoscopy of intraabdominal complications after traditional operations//Endoscopic surgery. — 2001. — No. 1 — Page 28-30.
  10. Messes V.N., Chumanevich O. A. Treatment intrabdominalnykh of postoperative complications of inflammatory and purulent character// Tez. докл. inter@ the surgeon, the congress "New technologies in surgery", Rostov-on-Don. - 2005. - Page 53.
  11. Butkevich A.Ts. Postoperative complications of traditional and miniinvasive operations at cholelithic illness / A.Ts. Butkevich, S.N.Bogdanov, A.E. Brovkin, Yu.V.Martynova//Annals хирургич. hepatology. — 2008. — T13, No. 3. — Page 215.
  12. Vasilyev A.A. Two-stage surgical treatment of patients of group of operational risk as prevention of intraoperative complications at a laparoscopic holetsistektomiya//the Endoscope. хир. - 2001. - No. 2. - C. 12.
  13. Vetshev of P. S. Holetsistektomiya from mini-access in treatment cholelithic illness / P.S.Vetshev, K.E.Chilingaridi, L.I.Ippolitov, F.A.Shpachenko//Klin. medical – 2001. - No. 1. – Page 50-54.
  14. Gavrilin A.V. Chreskozhnye medical and diagnostic interventions under control of ultrasonic research at surgical diseases of bodies of a gepatopankreatoduodenalny zone: Dis.... Dr.s of medical sciences — M. - — 1999. — With 48.
  15. Gallinger Yu.I., Karpenkova. V. I. damage of the gepatikokholedokh at a laparoscopic holetsistektomiya: Tez.Dokl. VIII междунар. науч. конф. surgeons-hepatologists of CIS countries//Annals хир. гепатол. - 2000. - T.5, No. 2. - Page 104-105.
  16. Daminova N. M. Video laparoscopic interventions in diagnostics and treatment of intraabdominal complications of surgeries on a liver and bilious ways/N M. Daminova, K.M. Kurbonov, A. Hayotov//the Messenger of surgery. — 2009. — No. 1. — Page 80-83.
  17. Daminova N. M. Possibilities of a video laparoscopy in diagnostics and treatment of complications of surgeries on a liver and bilious ways / N.M.Daminov, K.M. Kurbonov H.Yu., Sharipov//Annals хирургич. hepatology. — 2008. — T.13, No. 3. — Page 118.
  18. Yermolov A.S. A hardware reinfuziya of blood at intraabdominal bleedings/Ampere-second. Yermolov, V. V. Valetova, E.N. Kobzeva, E.A. Sakharova, R. B. Gavrilyuchenko, A.V. Dragunov, M. G. Kazakov// Surgery. — 2009. — No. 9. — Page 24-28.
  19. Zinets S. I. Forecasting, diagnostics and low-invasive surgical treatment postoperative intraabdominalnykh of complications: Avtoref. yew.... edging. medical sciences. — Perm, 2007. — Page 16.
  20. Ivanov V.A. Low-invasive interventions under control of ultrasonic research/VA. Ivanov, A.E. Klimov, K.V. Bobrov, A.E. Denisov, N. V. Sundushnikova, N. I. Dmitriyeva, O. A. Kravchuk//Annals хирургич. hepatology. — 2008. — T. 13, No. 3. — Page 231.
  21. Iskhakov B. R. Complications of a laparoscopic holetsistektomiya at sharp cholecystitis / B. R. Iskhakov, M. H. Vakkasov, B. E. Soliyev, A.E. Ruzmatov, A. Ismanov//the Annals хирургич. hepatology. — 2008. — T. 13, No. 3. — Page 120.
  22. Sh. I. Karimov of possibility of low-invasive methods of treatment of sharp cholecystitis at patients with high operational risk / Sh.I.Karimov, V. L. Kim, M.Sh.Khakimov, etc.//Surgery of Uzbekistan. - 2004. - No. 1. – Page 46-50.
  23. Sh. I. Karimov low-invasive methods in treatment of sharp cholecystitis at patients with raised operational risk / Sh.I.Karimov, V. L. Kim, M.Sh. Khakimov, etc.//the Endoscope. хир. - 2003. - No. 6. – Page 35-38.
  24. Krieger A.G. Diagnostics and treatment of postoperative intraabdominal complications / A.G. Krieger, B. K. Shurkalin, P. S. Glushkov, I.L. Andreytsev//Surgery. — 2003. — No. 8. — Page 19-23.
  25. Krieger A.G., Rzhebayev K.E., Voskresensky P. K., etc. Mistakes, dangers, complications at laparoscopic operations on bilious ways. Annals хир. гепатол. 2000; 5 (1): 90-97.
  26. Laberko L.A. Individual forecast of weight of a current of the postoperative period and widespread Peritonitis/Laberko L.A. outcome., Kuznetsov N. A., Rodoman G. V., Korotayev A.L., etc.//Surgery, 2005.-№ 2. - Page 29-33.
  27. S. L. mullets, Mullets L.S. Diagnosticheskaya and a medical laparoscopy at sharp destructive pancreatitis//the Annals хирургич. hepatology. — 2008. — T. 13, No. 3. — Page 240.
  28. Malinovsky N. N., Brekhov E.I. Istoriya of development of physical methods of a hemostasis in surgery//Surgery.-2006. No. 6. - Page 75-78.
  29. Nazyrov F.G., Akilov H.A., Altyev B. K., etc. Diagnostics and treatment of intraoperative damages and post-traumatic стриктур bilious channels. Annals хир. гепатол. 2000; 5 (2): 126-127.
  30. Nazyrov F.G., Hadzhibayev A.M., Altyev B. K. Operations at damages and the strikturakh of bilious channels. Surgery. 2006; 4: 46-52. LHE complications. Experience of 1700 Operations / M. Krasilnikov, A.I. Kurbangaliyev, M. V. Shakirov, Yu.A. Usolov//Annals of surgical hepatology. — Volume 4. — No. 2. — 1999. — Page 229.
  31. Panchenkov D. N., Mamalygina L.A. Yatrogennye of damage of extra hepatic bilious channels: diagnostics and surgical tactics at the present stage. Annals хир. гепатол. 2004; 9 (1): 156-163.
  32. Knocked A.A., Radenko E.E. Bleedings after endoscopic interventions on abdominal organs//the Ukrainian magazine of lowinvasive and endoscopic surgery. — 2001. — Volume 5. — No. 1.
  33. Timoshin A.D. Direct and remote complications of laparoscopic holetsistektomiya / A.D. Timoshin, A.U. Mirzayev, A.L. Barnayev, S. I. Shodiyev//Materials of the 10th scientific and practical conference of emergency medical care. Messenger of emergency medicine. — 2012. — No. 2. — Page 94.
  34. Timoshin A.D., Shestakov A.L., Kolesnikov S. A., etc. Results of miniinvasive operations in surgery of bilious ways. Annals хир. гепатол. 2006; 11 (1): 34-38.
  35. Fedorov A.V., Chadayev A.P., Sazhin of A.V. Relaparoskopiya in treatment of postoperative complications//Surgery. — 2005. — No. 8. — Page 80-85.
  36. Hadzhibayev A.M. Postoperative intraabdominal complications in urgentny surgery / A.M. Hadzhibayev, H.H. Asomov, K.S. Rizayev, U.R. Riskiyev, M. A. Mirsidikov//Messenger of emergency medicine. — 2012. — No. 1. — Page 5-10.
  37. Hadzhibayev of A.M. Fibrolaparoskopiya in diagnostics and complex treatment of postoperative intraabdominal complications / A.M. Hadzhibayev, H.H. Asomov, U.R. Riskiyev//Messenger of emergency medicine. — 2013. — No. 1. — Page 14-18.
  38. Hadzhibayev A.M., Alidzhanov F.B., Vakhidov A.B., etc. Comparative assessment of results of a video laparoscopic, minilaparotomny and traditional holetsistektomiya. Surgery of Uzbekistan. 2004; 2: 51-53.
  39. Hadzhibayev A.M., Malikov Yu.R., Atadzhanov Sh. K., etc. Laparoscopic interventions in diagnostics and treatment of postoperative intraabdominal complications in urgentny abdominal surgery. 12th International congress of surgeons-hepatologists of CIS countries. Annals хир. гепатол. 2005; 10 (2): 230.
  40. Шкроб O. S. ultrasonic research and low-invasive technologies under ultrasonography control in diagnostics and treatment of extra organ limited congestions of liquid in abdominal the cavity / Island S. Shkrob, S. A. Dadvani, A.N. Lotov, R. V. Karpova//Surgery. — 2002. — No. 2. — From 10-14.
  41. Ektov V. N. Low-invasive surgical interventions under ultrasonic control at abscesses abdominal cavity / Century N. Ektov, V. V. Novomlinsky, A.N. Sokolov, Yu.Yu. Melnikov//Surgery. — 2001. — No. 8 — Page 17-20.
  42. Agarwal N. Endoscopic management of postoperative bile leaks/N. Agarwal, B.C. Sharma, S. Garg, R. Kumar, S.K. Sarin// Hepatobiliary-Pancreat-Dis-Int. 2006 May; 5(2): 273-7.
  43. Barkun A.N. Post-cholecystectomy biliary leaks in the laparoscopic era: risk factors, presentation, and management/A.N. Barkun, M. Rezieg, S.N. Mehta//Gastrointest. Endosc — 2000 — Vol. 81. — P.277-282.
  44. Bartels H. Interventionelle Therapie des intraabdominallen Abszesses: Ergebnisse und Grenzen/H. Bartels, J. Thisen, H. Berger, J.R. Siewert//Langenbecks Arch. Chir. — 1999. — Bd.l 14. — S. 956-958.
  45. Berger D. Management of abdominal sepsis/Berger D., Buttenschoen K.//langenbecks Arch. Chir. — 2000. — Bd. 383. — N1. — S. 35-43.
  46. Brugge W.R. Diagnosis of postoperative bile leaks/W.R. Brugge, D.J. Rosenberg, A. Alavi//Am. J. Gastroenterol. — 2000. — Vol. 189. — P. 1278-1283.
  47. Colovic R. Slip of the T'tube within the common bile duct — a little known complication of the T tube drainage/R. Colovic V. Radak, N. Grubor, S. Matic//Srp-Arh-Celok-Lek. 2005 Mar-Apr; 133 (3-4): 138-41.
  48. Daskalakis K. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. An eight year experience in 1365 patients/Daskalakis K., S. Kapiris. E. Varada et al.//5 World Congress of the International Hepato-pancreato-biliary Association. — Japan. — 2002. — P.326.
  49. Dexter S.P. Relaparoscopy for the detecton and treatment of complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy/Dexter S.P., Miller G.V., Davides D. et al.//Am. J. Surg. - 2000. - N 4. - P. 316-319.
  50. DimicK J.B. Variation in postoperative complication rates after high-risk surgery in the US/DimicK J.B., P.J. Pronovost, J.A. Cowan et al.//Surgery. — 2003. — Vol.134. — N4. — P.534-540.
  51. Dubois F., Berthelot B. Cholecystectomie par mini-laparotomie// Nouv. Presse. Med. - 2002. - Vol. 11, N 15. - P.1139–1141.
  52. Fletcher D.R. Complications of cholecystectomy: risk of the laparoscopic approach and protetive effects of cholangiography/ Fletcher D.R., M.S.T. Hobbs, P. Tan et al.//Ann. Surg. — 1999. — Vol 229. — N4 — P. 449-457.
  53. Katsinelos P., Kountouras J., Paroutoglou G. et al. The role of endoscopic treatment in postoperative bile leaks. Hepatogastroenterology. 2006; 53 (68): 166-170.
  54. Marucci D.D., Grasper trauma during laparoscopic cholecystectomy/Marucci D.D., Shakeshaft A.J., Cartmill J.A., et al.// Aust N Z J Surg. - 2000. - Vol. 70. - N8. - P. 578-581.
  55. Oto A., Ernst R., Ghulmiyyah L., Hughes D., Saade G., Chaljub G. The role of MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of pregnant patients with acute pancreaticobiliary disease.//Br. J. Radiol., 2008; 51(61):21-24
  56. Paczynsk A., Koziarski T., Stanowski E. et al. Extrahepatic bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecysectomy-own material. Med. Sci. Monit. 2002; 8 (6): 438-440.
  57. Wang S.G. Primary duct closure versus T-tube drainage following laparoscopic choledochotomy/Wang S.G., K.S. Ma, J.H. Dong// Zhonghua-Wai-Ke-Za-Zhi. 2004 May 7; 42(9): 520-3.

Список всех публикаций, цитирующих данную статью

Copyright © 2025 UzScite | E-LINE PRESS