German archaeological activities In Turkmenistan

  • № 33 2022

Страницы: 

138

 – 

149

Язык: английский

Открыть файл статьи
Открыть страницу статьи в Интернет

Аннотация

The rich history of Turkmenistan contains historical and cultural monuments from various eras. In modern Turkmenistan, great attention is paid to scientific and educational development. This positive factor attracts the attention of scientists and research centers around the world, particularly Germany and its researchers.From 1905, when famous archaeologist Hubert Schmidt took part in excavations of Anau and Merv, to the German archaeologists following Turkmenistan’s independence in 1991, these scholars actively participate in archaeological excavations in Turkmenistan. Noteworthy is the center from the Eurasian Department of the world’s oldest German Archaeological Institute (Berlin) and the Institute for Near Eastern Archaeology at the Free University of Berlin. Another good example of German-Turkmen scientific contacts involved an exhibition of Bronze-Age artifacts from Gonur-depe in Berlin, Hamburg, and Mannheim. One of the goals of these exhibitions addressed the large number of potential tourists coming to Turkmenistan to familiarize themselves with the modern country. While, to date, no exhibitions displaying Turkmenistan’s overall heritage have been shown abroad, these archaeological exhibitions were an opportunity to portray the historical and artistic achievements of this great civilization for a large audience in Germany.

Список использованных источников

  1. Boroffka, N. Kurbanov, A. (2015). New Data on the Neolithic and Eneolithic of Central Asia: Dashly depe(Turkmenistan), in: Miras. No 1. (Ashgabat). P. 38-55.
  2. Childe, V. G. (1953). New Light on the Most Ancient East.New York: Norto, Tn.Dubova, N. A., Winkelma-Witkowsky, S., Novak, M., Sollee, A., Meier, D., Hübner, W.-Çh. D. (2018). Kratkaya informatsiya o sovmestnyh issledovaniyah IEA RAN I Otdela arheologii Bernskogo universiteta na Gonur-depe v 2014-2015gg. [Summaty on the collaborative research of the IEA RAS and Institute of Archeological Sciences of Bern University (Switzerland) at Gonur-Depe in 2014-2015], in: Proceedings of MAE.Vol. 7. Мoscow: Staryi sad Publ. P. 87-92 (in Russian).
  3. Götzelt, T. (1996). Ansichten der Archäologie SüdTurkmenistans bei der Eforsсhung der ‘Mittleren Bronzezeit’ (Periode Namazga V), in: Archäologie in Eurasien 2. Espelkamp, 1996.
  4. Heit, I. (2019). Hronologiya i arhitektura neoliticheskih I ranneeneoliticheskih obshestv Tsentralnoy Azii v svete novyh dannyh iz mnogosloynogo poseleniya onjukly-depe (Turkmenistan) [Chronology and Architecture of the Neolithic and Early Eneolithic Societies of Central Asia in the Light of New Data from the Multilayered Site of Monjukly-Depe (Turkmenistan)], in:Drevnosti Vostochnoy Evropy, Tsentralnoy Azii i Yuzhnoy Sibiri v kontekste svyazey i vzaimodeystvii v evraziiskom kulturnom prostranstve [Antiquities of Eastern Europe, Central Asia and Southern Siberia in the context of connections and interactions in the Eurasian cultural space (new data and concepts)]. Proceedings of the International Conference. St.Petersburg: evskaya tipografia Publ. P. 20-23 (in Russian).
  5. Heit, I. (2019). Chronological Modeling for Monjukly Depe and the Kopet Dag Region, in: S. Pollock, R.Bernbeck, B. Öğüt (eds.). Looking Closely. Excavations at Monjukli Depe, Turkmenistan, 2010–2014. Leiden:Sidestone Press, P. 81-106.
  6. Huff, D. (2001). Bronzezeitliche Monumentalarchitektur in Zentralasien, in: Migration und Kulturtransfer. Der Wandel vorder- und zentralasiatischer Kulturen im Umbruch vom 2. zum 1. vorchristlichen Jahrtausend,ed. R. Eichmann and H. Parzinger. Kolloquien zur Vorund Frühgeschichte 6. Bonn: Habelt, 2001. Р.181–197.
  7. Hübner, C., M. Novák, S. Winkelmann, (2019). The Swiss IAW-EurAsia Project on Urban Development and Land Use in Gonur Depe (Turkmenistan): A Geo-Magnetic Survey, in: Ch. Baumer, M. Novák (eds.). Urban Cultures of Central Asia from the Bronze Age to the Karakhanids:Learnings and Conclusions from New Archaeological Investigations and Discoveries. Proceedings of the First International Congress on Central Asian Archaeology.Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, P. 55-61.
  8. Huntington, E. (2019). The Pulse of Asia: A Journey in Central Asia Illustrating the Geographic Basis of History.New York: Houghton Mifflin.
  9. Khlopin, I. N. (1960). Dashlyji-depe i eneolitichwskie zemledel’tsy Yuzhnogo Turkmenistana [Dashlyji-depe and Eneolithic farmers of Southern Turkmenistan], in:Proceedings of YuTAKE. Vol. X. Ashgabat, AN Turkmenskoy SSR Publ. (In Russian).
  10. Khlopin, I. N. (1963). Pamyatniki rannego eneolita Yuzhnoy Turkmenii [Monuments of the Early Eneolithic in Southern Turkmenistan]. Moscow – Leningrad: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).
  11. Kohl, Ph. L. (1984). Central Asia. Paleolithic Beginnings to the Iron Age. Paris: Éditions Recherche sur les civilizations.Kohl, Ph. L. (2007). The Making of Bronze Age Eurasia.Cambridge University Press. Kurbanov, A. (2021). Southern Turkmenistan in the Neolithic Period: A Short Historiographical Review, in:Pearls, Politics and Pistachios: Essays in Anthropology and Memories on the Occasion of Susan Pollock’s 65th Birthday. Berlin: Ex oriente Publ. P. 505-518. Kurbanov, A., N. Boroffka, N. (2019). Multi-layer Prehistoric Site in South Turkmenistan – Dashly-Depe, in:Drevnosti Vostochnoy Evropy, Tsentralnoy Azii i Yuzhnoy Sibiri v kontekste svyazey i vzaimodeystvii v evraziiskom kulturnom prostranstve [Antiquities of Eastern Europe, Central Asia and Southern Siberia in the context of connections and interactions in the Eurasian cultural space (new data and concepts)]. Proceedings of the International Conference. St.Petersburg: evskaya tipografia Publ. P. 26-28.
  12. Kurbanov, A., N. Boroffka (2022). New Data on the Protohistoric Khorasan: The Dashly Depe Excavations (Turkmenistan), in: M. Labbaf-Khaniki (ed.), Ḵorāsān Nāmak: Essays on the Archaeology, History, and Architecture of Khorasan in Honour of Rajabali Labbaf- Khaniki. Tehran, Р. 21-34.Kurbanov, A., G. Yagshymyradov, (2015). Daşlydepe ýadygärliginde ýüze çykarylan täze gymmatlyklar // Türkmenistanda ylym we tehnika [Science and Technology in Turkmenistan. Scientific-theoretical journal of the Academy of Sciences of Turkmenistan] No 1,Aşgabat, Р. 40-43 (in Turkmen). Lisitsyna, G. N. (1978). Stanovlenie i razvitie oroshaemogo zemledeliya v Yuzhnoy Turkmenii [Formation and development of irrigated agriculture in Southern Turkmenistan].Мoscow: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).
  13. Masson, V. M. (1981). Altyn-depe (Proceedings of YuTAKE. Vol. XVIII). Leningrad: Nauka Publ. (In Russian).Pollock, S., R. Bernbeck, (2019). Stratigraphy and Settlement Layout, in: Looking Closely. Excavations at Monjukli Depe, Turkmenistan, 2010–2014. Leiden: Sidestone Press, Р. 33-80.Pollock, S., R. Bernbeck, R., B. Öğüt (2012). Renewed Excavations at Monjukli Depe, Turkmenistan, in: Neo-lithics 2, Р. 15-19.Pollock, S., R. Bernbeck, B. Öğüt B. (eds.) (2019). Looking Closely. Excavations at Monjukli Depe, Turkmenistan, 2010–2014. Leiden: Sidestone Press.Pollock, S, R. Bernbeck, N. Norbert Benecke, G. Castro Gessner, M. Daszkiewicz, J. Eger, A. Keßeler, N. F.Mille., M. Pope, P. Ryan, P. Sturm (2011). Excavations at Monjukli Depe, Meana-Čaača Region, Turkmenistan,2010, in: Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran und Turan 43, Р. 169-237. Pumpelly, R. (ed.) (1905). Explorations in Turkestan, Expedition of 1903. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
  14. Pumpelly, R. (ed.) (1908). Explorations in Turkestan; Expedition of 1904. Prehistoric Civilizations of Anau, Origins,Growth, and Influence of Environment. Vol. 1-2.Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication.Pumpelly, R. (1908). Ancient Anau and the Oasis-World,in: R. Pumpelly (ed.). Explorations in Turkestan; Expedition of 1904. Prehistoric Civilizations of Anau, Origins,Growth, and Influence of Environment. Vol. 1.Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, Р. 1-80. Pumpelly, R. (ed.) (2004). Türküstandaky derňew işleri.Änewiň gadymy ösüşi. Aşgabat: Miras Publ. (in Turkmen).
  15. Sarianidi, V. I. (1990). Drevnosti strany Margush [Antiquities of the country Margus]. Ashgabat: Ylum Publ. (in Russian). Sarianidi, V. I. (2001). Necropilis of Gonur and Iranian Paganism. Moscow: World media Publ.Sarianidi, V. I. (2002). Margush: Ancient Oriental Kingdom in the Old Delta of the Murghab River. Aşgabat: Türkmendöwlethabarlary Publ.Sarianidi, V. I. (2005). Goňurdepe: City of Kings and Gods.Aşgabat: Miras.Sarianidi V. I. (2010). Maryskij velajat, Turkmenistan, in: N.Boroffka, S. Hansen (eds.). Archäologische Forschungen in Kasachstan, Tadschikistan, Turkmenistan und Usbekistan. Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Eurasien-Abteilung, Р. 33-37.Sarianidi, V. I., Boroffka N. and N. A. Dubova (2012). Cultural Contacts of Margiana: Turkmenistan, in the 3rd Millennium BC. New evidence from Gonur Depe,Burial 4150, in: Gandhāran Studies. 6. Р. 1-17.Sarianidi, V. I., Boroffka, N. and N. A. Dubova (2014).Kulturnye kontaktu Margiany (Turkmenistan) v III tys. do n.e. Novye dannye po Gonur-depe pogrebenie No 4150 [Cultural contacts of Margiana (Turkmenistan)in the 3rd millennium BC New data on Gonur Depe (burial No. 4150], in: Proceedings of MAE. Vol.5. Мoscow: Staryi Sad Publ. P. 127-137 (in Russian).
  16. Schmidt, H. (1908). “Archaeological Excavations in Anau and Old Merv, in: R. Pumpelly (ed.). Explorations in Turkestan; Expedition of 1904. Prehistoric Civilizations of Anau, Origins, Growth, and Influence of Environment.Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, Р. 81-210.Schmidt, H. (2003). 1904 Excavations at Anau North, in:F. Hiebert, K. Kurbansakhatov (eds.). A Central Asian Village at the Dawn of Civilization. Excavations at Anau, Turkmenistan. Philadelphia: University Museum Monograph, Р. 174-193.
  17. Wemhoff, M., M. Nawroth, R. M. Weiss, A. Wieczorek,(eds.) (2018). Margiana. Ein Königreich der Bronzezeit in Turkmenistan. Petersberg: Michael Imhof Verlag.Winkelmann, S. (2000). Intercultural Relations between Iran, the Murghabo-Bactrian Archaeological Complex (BMAC), Northwest India and Failaka in the Field of Seals, in: East and West. 50 (1/4). Р. 43-95.

Список всех публикаций, цитирующих данную статью