Биогазовые комплексы: анализ их использования в различных регионах и странах мира

  • № 9 2015

Страницы: 

41

 – 

58

Язык: русский

Открыть файл статьи
Открыть страницу статьи в Интернет

Аннотация

В статье рассмотрены направления повышения экономической устойчивости на основе использования процесса выращивания биосырья для производства энергетических ресурсов. С точки зрения эффективного использования различных видов биотоплива (биоэтанол, рапсовое масло, метиловые эфиры растительных масел, биогаз или биометан) в расчете на единицу площади наиболее перспективным является биогаз и его производная – биометан. Производство газообразного биотоплива позволит замещать ископаемые не возобновляемые энергетические ресурсы и уменьшить себестоимость продукции аграрных формирований. В биогазовых комплексах используются как отходы животноводства, так и растительное сырье.

Мақолада энергетик ресурсларни ишлаб чиқариш учун био-хомашё етиштириш жараёнидан фойдаланиш асосида иқтисодий барқарорликни ошириш йўналишлари ўрганилган. Турли хил биоёқилғилардан (биоэтанол, рапс ёғи, ўсимлик ёғларининг метил эфирлари, биогаз ёки биометан) бир бирлик майдонга ҳисоблаб самарали фойдаланиш нуқтаи назаридан энг истиқболли биогаз ва ундан ишлаб чиқариладиган биометан ҳисобланади. Газсифат биоёқилғини ишлаб чиқариш қазиб олинадиган тикланмайдиган энергетик ресурсларни ўрнини босиш ва аграр бирлашмалар маҳсулотларининг таннархини пасайтириш имконини беради. Биогаз комплексларида чорвачилик чиқиндиларидан ва ўсимлик хомашёсидан фойдаланилади.

In article the directions of economic stability on the basis of bioraw materials implementation in the process of cultivation for production of energy resources are considered. From the point of view of effective utilization of different types of biofuel (bioethanol, rape oil, methyl air of vegetable oils, biogas or biomethane) per unit of area the most perspective is biogas and its derivative – bio-methane. Production of gaseous biofuel will allow to replace fossil non-renewable energy resources and to reduce cost of products of agrarian formations. In biogas complexes are used both animal husbandry waste, and vegetable raw materials.

Список использованных источников

  1. Boltunov V. V. Modernization of agro-industrial complex as one of conditions of social and economic development of the region / Regional economy: theory and practice. 2015. No. 9. P. 25-32.
  2.  Bolokhonov M. A. Food market and rural economy: problems of interaction and prospect of development. Saratov: Saratov source, 2011. 110 p.
  3. Drokin V. V., Zhuravlev A. S., Chistyakov Yu.F. Influence of the world agrofood market on self-development of regional agrarian systems / Region economy. 2011. No. 4. P. 158-164.
  4. Kucheruk P.P. Perspektivi of a virobnitstv to ogaz з sum_shy the gnoyovikh vіdhоdіv a tvarinnitstva that roslinno i sirovin in Ukrain /Pry. Teplotekhnika. – 2013. – T. 35. – No. 1. – P. 107-113.
  5.  Маznev G. E. Ekonomichna еfеktivnost the innovatsy the tekhnolog reshenyi in agrarian proizvodstv / Ekonomika of agrarian and industrial complex. – 2010. – No. 6. – P. 118-127.
  6.  Mesel-Veselyak V. Ya. Formuvannya the samozabezpechuyuchikh the energetic of systems at selsky gospodarstva / Ekonomika of agrarian and industrial complex. – 2010. – No. 12. – P. 31-37.
  7. New technologist biokonversia: Monografy / Ya.B. Blum, G.G. Geletukh, І. P. Grigoruk, and other. – K.: Agrar Mediya Group, 2010. – 326 p.
  8. Procedure of payments of economic efficiency of biogas complexes. The technical code of the established practice. TKP 17.02-05-2011 (02120). Official publication. Ministry for Protection of the Environment and Natural Resources of Republic of Belarus. – Minsk. 2011. – 26 p.
  9. Rehden L. Production of biogas in Republic of Belarus and Sweden. – Baltic University Press, 2012. – 39 p.
  10.  Bhuyan, S. Does Vertical Integration Effect Market Power? Evidence from U.S. Food Manufacturing Industries / S. Bhuyan // Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. – 2005. – April. – P. 263-276.
  11. Bramley, Julia. Agricultural biogas in the United States. A Market Assessment / Julia Bramley, Jeff Cheng-Hao Shih, Lum Fobi, Axum Teferra, Cammy Peterson, Rose Yuan Wang, Lydia Rainville. – Tufts University Urban & Environmental Policy & Planning. – Field Project Team #6. – Spring 2011. – 192 p.
  12.  Braun, Rudolf. Biogas from Energy Crop Digestion / Rudolf BRAUN, Peter WEILAND, Arthur WELLINGER. – IEA Bioenergy, 2010. – 19 р.
  13.  Caves, R.E. The Empsrical Determinants of Vertical Integration / R.E. Caves, R.M. Bradburd // Journal of Economical Behavior and Organization. – 1988. – #9. – P.265-279.
  14. Dalgaard, T. A model for fossil energy use in Danish agriculture used to compare organic and conventional farming / T. Dalgaard, N. Alberg, J.R. Porter // Agriculture ecosystems & environment. – 2001. – # 87 (1). – P. 51-65.
  15.  Davies, S.W. A New Index of Vertical Integration: Some Estimates for UK Manufacturing / S.W. Davies, C. Morris // International Journal of Industrial Organization. – 1995. – #13. – P.151-177.
  16. Delzeit, Ruth. An Economic Assessment of Biogas Production and Land Use under the German Renewable Energy Source Act 2012 / Ruth Delzeit, Wolfgang Britz, and Peter Kreins. – # 1767. – April 201 2, update November 2012. – 26 p.
  17.  Eriksson, Philip. The Potential of Biogas as Vehicle Fuel in Europe – A Technological Innovation Systems Analysis of the Emerging Bio-Methane Technology. Report # 2007:6, ISSN: 1404-8167 / Philip Eriksson, Martin Olsson. – Göteborg, Sweden, 2007. – 137 p.
  18. Holm-Nielsen, Jens Bo. Danish Centralized Biogas Plants / Jens Bo Holm-Nielsen, Teodorita Al Sead. – Bioenergy Department, University of Southern Denmark, May 2000. – 28 p.
  19.  Kalyuzhnyi, Sergey. Energy potential of anaerobic digestion of wastes produced in Russia via biogas and microbial fuel cell technologies / Sergey Kalyuzhnyi // Pure Appl. Chem. – 2008. – Vol. 80, No. 10. – Р. 215-224.
  20.  Laaber, M. Development of an evaluation system for biogas plants / M. Laaber, R. Kirchmay, R. Madler, R. Braun. 4th Int. Symposium Anaerobic Digestion of Solid Waste, Copenhagen, Denmark. 2005. 221 p.
  21. Moller, H.B. Manure and energy crops for biogas production. Status and barriers. [Электронный ресурс] / H.B. Mоller, A.M. Nielsen, M. Murto, K. Christensson, J. Rintala, M. Svensson, M. Seppälä, T. Paavola, I. Angelidaki, P.L. Kaparaju // Accepted for publication by Nordic council of Ministers, MJS. – 2008. – Режим доступa: www.norden.org.mjs.
  22.  Navickas, K. Biogas for farming, energy conversion and environment protection. International symposium Biogas, technology and environment / K. Navickas // University of Maribor, Faculty of Agriculture, 2007. – P. 25-29.23. Tilman, D. Biodiver-sity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland exoeriment / Tilman, D.; R. Eich, P. and K. Nops, J. 2006. – Nature 441. – Р. 629-632.
  23.  Venendaal, R. European energy crops: a synthesis / R. Venendaal, U. Оrgensen, C.A. Foster // Biomass and Bioenergy. – 1997. – #13 (3). – P.147-185.
  24.  Vindiš, Peter. Evaluation of Energy Crops for Biogas Production with a Combination of Simulation Modeling and Dex-i Multicriteria Method / Peter Vindiš, Denis Stajnko, Peter Berk, Miran Lakota // Pol. J. Environ. Stud. – 2012. – Vol. 21, No. 3. – Р. 763-770.
  25.  Weiland, P. Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production / P. Weiland // Paper presented at the IEA Bio-energy Seminar, Ludlow, UK, April 17th, 2008. 17 p.

Список всех публикаций, цитирующих данную статью